The Milgram experiment, the danger of obedience
The 1 of June of 1962 died in the gift Adolf Eichmann after to be captured in Argentina by the Mossad, court in Jerusalem by crimes against the guilty humanity and to be declared. Their last words before dying were:
” Long life to Germany. Long life to Austria. Long Life to Argentina. These are the countries with which I identify myself more and I am going never them to forget. I had to obey the rules of the war and those of my flag. I am ready. “
A year later, Stanley Milgram, psychologist in the University of Yale, it was wondered how it was possible that a normal and current person, that did not have a special hatred towards the Jews, had been able to actively contribute in the Holocausto by only to have received orders. Eichmann was the one in charge of the logistics of transports of the Nazi concentration camps and put as much fervor in its work that, having even stopped Hitler the massive executions of Jewish prisoners at the end of the war, it continued carrying out them.
Milgram put entoces in march a pioneering experiment on human obedience: through newspaper announcements it engaged volunteers to participate in which they thought that it was a study on the learning and memory.
To each of these volunteers it was mentioned to them next to another person who was made happen in fact through another subject of the experiment being an actor and she was invited to them to extract a problem of a ballot box that would determine who would act like “teacher” and who like “student” in the experiment. The problems were fixed reason why the actor always finished being the “then student” beginning the real staging.
To the “student” one sat down and he tied in a species of electrical chair connected a Control Panel to him that would handle the “teacher” and to both electrodes in the body were placed to them. A small unloading of 45 volts occurred them so that the “teacher” was conscious of the pain that could get to produce the “student” and it inquired to them into the ominous consequences that could cause the excessive provision of electricity.
Next the practical part of the experiment began: the “student” would have to memorise and to respond to pairs of words correctly that the “teacher” would have recited to him previously. If the “student” failed he would be receiving from “masterful” more and more intense the electrical unloadings. But what the “teacher” did not know he was that the unloadings were not real: he simulated them more and more to the actor putting emphasis in the pain that theoretically suffered and begging to every time stop the experiment with more anguish.
The experiment was of great realism: the shouts of the actor were recorded and when certain intensity in the unloadings arrived (fictitious 300 volts) “student” stopped answering the questions and simulated an entrance in comma.
The “teacher” could stop at any time to provide unloadings but he declared his preoccupation by the “student” Milgram would order to him until in four occasions that continued. If after the fourth order of Milgram the “teacher” refused to continue the experiment he would conclude. If one did not refuse to stop administered three consecutive unloadings of 450 volts to the “student” and the experiment finalized.
The results of the experiment could not be more chilling: 65% of the “teachers” (26 of 40) got to apply the unloadings of 450 volts, although they declarararon to feel “uncomfortable” when doing it; all of them got to doubt at some time but no got to refuse in round continuing before arriving at the 300 volts. Those that arrived until full stop from the experiment nor you would siquieran they worried later about the health of the “student”.
CONCLUSION
All a test of how a person can release all their sadism taking refuge in the premise of which she received orders to commit his acts. The people who fulfill you order, in a hierarchy scale, attribute the responsibility of its acts to the person of greater authority, because this is considered like legitim.
When the individuals we took responsibility of our acts obedience yields… when the responsibility is of others, you order we obey them.
Eichmann only obeyed orders… or not…
I it truth fodder that of eichmann, am not the only case so that lack many of solving, since the Nazis left to everything a puzzle that nobody can solve. I say it so that I descend from Nazis and because I hope drinks of an Israeli descendant of victim of nazism. he is something that deberia to leave itself since in World War II for many there are many open wounds that do not seran healed and that furthermore were in history as tatoo.para my is a bittersweet drink already quue not that they especially thought of my when having son and a young person of 14 years like I. it is not possible to be solved but it is not possible to be repeated. that is what it is possible to be said.
[...] The Milgram experiment, the danger of obedience [...]
To be sincere, all this subject of holocausto seems to me exciting (it is not that he is Nazi nor nothing of the sort) by the form as so much could be dedicated, studies, mysteries, EVERYTHING. Yes, he was bad but nobody can deny to me that the form is surprising.
For my Eichmann simply he followed orders, any more and in a certain point which towards I stop being bad, everything was just and truly culprit did not feel.
….the good is relative